Search: Site   Web
Colorado Springs Arts Blog ~ All Things Artistic in Colorado Springs

REVIEW: ‘The Wedding Singer’ a bland but tuneful retelling of 1998 Sandler film

November 4th, 2009, 11:08 am · 4 Comments · posted by twallinger

“THE WEDDING SINGER”

When: 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, Nov. 4

Where: Pikes Peak Center, 190 S. Cascade Ave.

Tickets: $30-$50, 520-7469, 1-866-464-2626, ticketswest.com and TicketsWest outlets.

Grade: C+

 

Screen-to-stage adaptations are all the rage on Broadway these days. It takes a lot of money to mount a production and producers, of course, want to limit their risk by offering the theatergoing public stories they’re already familiar with.

 

Still, the translation of the 1998 Adam Sandler vehicle “The Wedding Singer” to a Broadway musical remains a bit of a head scratcher. It wasn’t a hugely successful film. And it already had plenty of music in its bouncy, best of the 80’s soundtrack. Scrap that and you’ve cut much of the heart out of the film.

But when I caught the national tour last night at the Pikes Peak Center, I was happy to find that the pop score composed by Matthew Sklar with lyrics by Chad Beguelin was actually quite strong. Amy Marie McCleary’s choreography may have been uncreative and lazy, but the songs themselves were a lot of fun and for the most part tuneful. I especially enjoyed the charming “Come Out of the Dumpster” and the hard-driving ode to the decade’s materialistic excesses, “All About the Green” (one of the only two songs carried over from the film was the amusingly bipolar Sandler composition, “Somebody Kill Me Please”).

Unfortunately, the story didn’t fare as well. In stripping down the plot to make room for the songs, Beguelin and Tim Herlihy made the characters even more two-dimensional than they are in the movie. There’s the gay best friend. The skanky ex-girlfriend. The foul-mouthed grandma. And, of course, the money-grubbing jerk of a fiance. You could almost see the writers checking off their list of Obligatory Romantic Comedy Characters.

And the gags, for the most part, lacked any wit or originality. For example, when Julia’s mother tries to convince her daughter that the pompous ass she’s about to marry is Mr. Right, she runs through that well-worn litany of praise: “He’s rich. He’s handsome. He’s charming. And he’s rich!”.

Instead, what laughs there are come from the eye-winking references to the 80’s, including the usual jokes about big hair and even bigger cell phones. One of the few truly funny bits–and completely new to the musical–is a scene at a Las Vegas wedding chapel, where the witnesses include an assortment of 80’s-era celebrity impersonators, including a faux-Tina Turner, Mr. T and Imelda Marcos, all of which was presided over by a minister who bore a striking resemblance to the Great Communicator (or Teflon President, take your pick) himself.

The two leads have plenty of chemistry, which is a good thing for them as J. Michael Zygo and Jillian Zygo (as you might guess) are married in real life, playing their characters  much sweeter and a whole lot less goofy than Sandler and Drew Barrymore did in the film. The seconds are good as well–surprisingly so, considering what they’re given to work with.

People who love the movie will find some things to like in this unambitious but comfortably familiar musical version. If you don’t love the movie, there’s nothing here that’ll change your mind.

And if you weren’t lucky enough to live through the fabulous 80’s, you’re not going to find a whole to laugh at.

Order tickets here.

You can watch a montage of musical numbers from the tour here (featuring, apparently, none of the people you’ll actually see at the Pikes Peak Center).

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
ADVERTISEMENT

 4 Comments

  • Justin says:

    Wow. Do you just HAVE to have something to be critical of?

    Choreography was “uncreative and lazy”? Hardly. It was very entertaining.

    There were actually two cool songs carried over from the movie. Which should have been obivous to you - IF you’d paid attention during the movie. In fact, the other song that you failed to mention was during the grand finale scene in the movie - DUH!!!

    “Checking off obligatory romantic comedy characters”? Would you have changed the main characters from the movie and written a different story?

    Gags that lacked any wit? Come on!

    What’s your problem? Wifey doesn’t like it when you criticize her at home so you need to unleash here?

    Sounds like you were a little irritable last night. Or like I said, you just HAVE to have something to criticize.

    I paid $50 per seat for me and my three daughters, plus fees, concessions, and souveniers. I’d reccommend anyone, well, anyone who isn’t irritable, do the same.

    It was the first professional musical that I’ve ever seen - I don’t really care for them! But I thought my daughters would enjoy it, and I figured I probably would too. And we did.

    Sorry to spoil your thoughts, but you are just plain wrong on many of them.

  • twallinger says:

    Oh, so you know my wife… ;)

    You’re right about them carrying over two songs, the other being “Grow Old With You”. It’s been a while since I saw the movie. I’ve made the correction here. Thanks.

    My daughter likes everything and even she agreed with me on the choreography. In fact, she thought it was like something from a high school production. Not that there’s anything wrong with high school shows. I see a lot of them myself. But I don’t pay $50 a seat for them.

    I didn’t think the characters in the movie were two-dimensional. They only became so when the story was translated into a musical. Forced to create a shorter book, as anyone adapting a film to stage musical must do, the writers took the easy way out and turned the characters into caricatures.

    I’m glad you liked it, but I thought the response of the audience was lukewarm compared to most of the musicals I’ve seen recently.

    Look, you admitted this was the first professional musical you’d ever seen. That’s great. Maybe it’ll make you want to see more of them. If you do, I’ll think you’ll find there are a lot better ones out there.

    In fact, go see Wicked in Denver. It’s expensive, but if you leave out the concessions and souvenirs, it’ll probably work out to about the same.

    And I’m sure that after seeing this bewitchingly clever show, you won’t think The Wedding Singer is so great.

  • Amy says:

    Justin said “It was the first professional musical that I’ve ever seen - I don’t really care for them! ”

    Then how could Justin have possibly known if this musical was any good or not?

    If you do anything for the first time, it is going to be the best you’ve ever had…

  • Dilettante says:

    Hey, Justin? No need to be a jerk. Todd’s doing his job. You seem unfamiliar, for the most part, with live performance. Yep, you shelled out a mound of clams, even more than a baseball game or the IceCapades, so it HAD to be good, right? I mean, you and the girls had a heck of a time, so what the hell is THIS guy talking about, am I right?

    Listen: it’s nice that you had a good time. But Todd doesn’t come to the garage and tell YOU how to fix cars, does he?

Leave a Reply

ADVERTISEMENT 
ADVERTISEMENT 
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site